 |
 |
 |
We
got a lot of mail on the passing Sunday night of Nan Kempner, one of the last of the great high priestesses of fashion in America.
Her almost religious devotion to fashion belied her talent for
living.
One of the letters we received testifying to that came from
a European man who first met her in Paris:
I had the honor of meeting Mrs. Kempner many years ago whilst
attending an Haute Couture show in Paris. That was chez Chanel;
I was 27 and I was there with my girlfriend.
 |
Nan
on the cover of Quest, November 2000
|
|
I clearly
remember her entrance. She was as glamorous as only she could be.
I can’t get out of my head the spectacular
shatoosh she was holding on her thin long hands and the beautiful
sling backs she was wearing. My girlfriend and I were in awe.
I have had the privilege to meet very glamorous people in my
life but no one like Mrs. Kempner. She exuded chic and style.
Minutes later she was seated right next to me! She had exchanged
places with someone else .... She introduced herself to us and
with a lovely smile she whispered " I have been rather naughty.
I didn't like my seating arrangements, who wants to sit next
to another old prune like me. I said to myself I MUST conquer
that young man!, so here I am”.
And there she was. A connection was made. More so when during
our conversation we talked about our families and she surprisingly
recalled having met my grandmother many many years ago at Yves
St Laurent ´s home.
By the end of the show she asked us if we wanted to share dinner
with her. Christa and I took her to Le Voltaire, one of her favourite
restaurants in Paris. From then onwards I would not see Mrs.
Kempner very often but every time I was in New York she would
find a moment to have tea with me. Always at The Carlyle, my
home when I am in town.
Nan was a very democratic person, no matter what people may think.
She moved with such grace and ease between so many worlds and
cultures that she was the perfect companion to take to a family
dinner in Venice or a black tie event in Paris. She was always
prepared, interested and charming.
I can’t remember when
I first met Nan Kempner, although I knew about
her and had seen her many times long before. The following is
an entry to my Social
Diary in Quest magazine ten years ago, June 1995:
“Wednesday. Cancer Research Benefit. The Racquet
Club. Society
and fashion crowd; large and diverse, most of whom appeared not
to know each other except for the large paid-for-tables of society
types including Mrs. Thomas Kempner, chairman
of this night’s
event. Mrs. Kempner, known to her friends as Nan, is a woman
who more than anybody else around New York exemplifies that aphorism
attributed to both Babe Paley and Gloria
Guinness about how a
woman can’t be too rich or too thin.
Mrs. Kempner is so that thin that it’s startling.
She also has straight-as-an-arrow posture. So when you see her
walking
down the street, clop-de-clop-de-cloppity clop, as I
did one afternoon while having my coffee at Starbucks on Lexington
and
78th, when you see her looking like she knows exactly where she’s
going, you notice. Her beauty is her presence. She has good shoulders
and a basically flat front and back. From either side, however,
she has a small waist, small hips and long pencil-thin legs.
She has a lot of thick, blonde, wavy hair. When she wears it
pulled back, it accentuates a combination of the aquiline and
feline so that you might not know if she’s smiling or plotting,
just like in a novel.
There have been thousands of pictures taken of Mrs. Kempner.
She’s been in all the fashion magazines many times. You
can see her at parties here and all over the country and the
rest of the world. She must know thousands of people because
she goes and goes and goes. For Mrs. Kempner travels only in
the stratosphere. The interesting part is how she looks. She’s
very soigné in a way that is practically extinct. It’s
an extreme fashionableness, an almost over-the-top kind of chic
that is so attended to it becomes an art. A social art. I don’t
know Mrs. Kempner, so I have no idea what her personality is
like, be it charming or witty or chatty or somber (which I doubt).
Her rigid self-presentation is distinctly cosmopolitan, Euro-New
York. She is San Francisco born and bred. But she belongs to
New York.
Walter Kerr, the great theatre critic and playwright of the 1960s
and 1970s wrote a piece 30 years ago about the great female stars
of the Broadway stage. Merman, Mary Martin, Lynn Fontanne,
Carol Channing. He pointed out how unreal, how very
unpedestrian they were. How exaggerated but so raffiné that they
could (and did)
claim all the attention for themselves. He could have made the
same observation about Mrs. Kempner. She’s out of the school
of Vreeland and Wallis Simpson and Coco
Chanel. They’re
freaks of style, aesthetic exaggerations, the genesis of high
fashion.”
We went searching through our archives of images of Nan over
the past fifteen years. There were two Quest covers
among them. We know she had closets full of clothes but you can
see from
the pictures, if there were something she especially liked, she
wasn’t shy about wearing it again and again, including
when she was photographed. It was, after all, for the fun of
it. And she was one of the lucky ones: she had fun. |
 |
Nan
solo
|
|
 |
Floating through the crowd
|
|
 |
With Grace and Chris Meigher
|
|
|
|
 |
Clockwise
from top left: Nan with David Koch and Anne Sidamon
Eristoff; Nan with Julio Iglesias; Nan with Wendy Lehman
and Dr. Frank Petido.
|
|
|
|
 |
L.
to r.: Nan with Chris Meigher; with Patrick McMullan;
with Grace Meigher and Muffie Potter Aston.
|
|
|
 |
Carol
Mack and Nan
|
|
 |
Nan
and John Richardson
|
|
 |
Nan
on the cover of Quest, May 1997
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.
to r.: Nan with DPC; Nan with a friend; Nan and
Adolfo.
|
|
 |
Kenny
Lane, Loulou de la Falaise, and Nan
|
|
 |
Princess
Michael of Kent, Gianfranco Ferre, and Nan
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |